Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Upcoming channel changes We're *previewing* some upcoming changes so people 1) can understand and 2) provide feedback. These changes are not launching yet. It will be a couple weeks. There will also be a bunch of communication to channel owners. After reading the entire doc, feel free to reply to with feedback or send me a DC. I've tried to answer a lot of common questions in the FAQ. https://warpcast.notion.site/Upcoming-channel-changes-1056a6c0c101800caee6ea8133f8f966
88 replies
45 recasts
210 reactions

Mark Fishman pfp
Mark Fishman
@markfishman
I would be interested in having a way to allow anyone to reply but only members to post. This would be a way to "vet" potential members – if they contribute to discussions, they can be invited to post top-level casts
2 replies
0 recast
13 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Anyone can reply to a cast in a channel, but non-members will be below the fold (but still discoverable). I should add to the FAQ.
3 replies
0 recast
18 reactions

Mark Fishman pfp
Mark Fishman
@markfishman
Gotcha, thanks. Would be nice if there was an easily discoverable non-members section and then an additional "probable spam" section Maybe even use badges for channel members? Then put non-spam, non-member replies below, and actually hide the probable spam
2 replies
1 recast
1 reaction

Sean Brennan pfp
Sean Brennan
@seanwbren
"Channels now require membership to cast or reply — you must be invited to be a member." -is contradictory?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Alemac pfp
Alemac
@alemac
Anyone? or anyone with the membership? It's not the same. Mark is referring to having a way twhere anyone (with membership or not) could REPLY, but only members to CAST.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction