Ethereum

There are a lot of debates around native rollups;

My first concern is whether we are reinventing sharding again and if this approach has the same problems that made us to revert sharding from Ethereum's roadmap. 

Trying to give answers for this.

Researcher
Co-author of EIP-7212 
Ex- @getclave

Everyone keeps talking about how every company/community/application would end up running their own chain because they can capture their own MEV. 

I think the rollup roadmap aligns Ethereum to that future. Native rollups are good for the ETH asset because it keeps this MEV in the base layer, which once again would make Ethereum worse for apps looking to control their own execution experience. 

intersend.io | via sequence. pimlico. poap. polygon. consensys. paxful. flipside crypto. dash. bridgewater. darpa. secdef. navy. dia. linktr.ee/alexanderchopan

Yes! https://x.com/doganeth_en/status/1875224140317388941

i think i saw something on your profile that was dogan.cyber .... did you go there?

IMO the big advantage (and it's big) of native rollups over execution sharding isn't in the (current) implementation details, but in who is executing. Native rollups can be perused by anyone, allowing for quick parallel iterations by multiple teams, looking for good tech but also PMF. This much surface bigger area for innovation is more likely to succeed.

so many l2's that feel like they do the same thing