Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ted (not lasso)
@ted
anybody else see this? thoughts? https://x.com/amirormu/status/1885819487850577976?s=46&t=rxAVkMPnT_8alZYrwLqp6g
31 replies
8 recasts
88 reactions
Cassie Heart
@cassie
My take is a bit more nuanced. Vorhees stating that the team had 12% of the tokens, and 25% was unlocked immediately after a year of work (therefore 3% of total supply) stems from tradfi norms of vesting cliffs. What he's missing is that this isn't even being done like tradfi: this wasn't broadly disclosed in advance in any way whereas in tradfi these types of events are published well in advance (like IPOs, identified individuals with large holdings, for example). On top of this, the product is a lie. It's not private AI, there are no real means of preserving privacy any different than OpenAI or others.
2 replies
0 recast
29 reactions
Daniel Fernandes
@dfern.eth
fair criticism, at least I expect them to at least try deploying some of NVidia's GPU TEE solutions in the future, but to be fair to them, there aren't a lot of GPU TEEs out in the wild for cloud consumption that aren't also exorbitantly expensive.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Cassie Heart
@cassie
If they decide to adopt it and argue TEE is making it private (which would have to be extended to the interaction surface the user is working with rather than just the GPUs), it's still pretty broken. There has yet to be a single TEE implementation that hasn't been penetrated at least once already.
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
