Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
David Furlong
@df
why do crypto wallets not auto revoke any approvals an hour after a user grants them?
9 replies
0 recast
19 reactions
Stephan
@stephancill
Have seen metamask and coinbase smart wallet only approve the amount necessary for the transaction
2 replies
0 recast
5 reactions
links 🏴
@links
Cause gas?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
Once upon a time, I wanted to submit this, but never got to do it (I don't remember why tbh). https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/time-limited-erc-20-approvals/7749
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Zeen Train
@zeentrain
At this point, for wallets, they don't *really* want to be in the game of auto-execution. Risky [because execution] with questionable upside given that users are so cost-conscious
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
shazow
@shazow.eth
I like this idea abstractly, the ability to schedule transactions via some kind of hook. You'd need to maintain it rebased over the latest nonce if you make new transactions, but the wallet could hide that. That idea aside, Permit2 has timeouts which we should probably be using anyway. 🤪
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Chinmay 🕹️🍿
@chinmay.eth
Are you referring to onchain approvals or local connections?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ryan J. Shaw Ⓜ️🎩
@rjs
Also: it seems like few of them have beneficiary management, the closest you get is 'recent' transactions? I want to save a CEX address and link it to a particular chain so that I don't do that dumb thing I did last year - but nope, every single time I have to remember to bridge before send.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
lightcap
@lightcap.eth
I'm doing product research around this sort of thing as we speak. Got anything else you'd like to see in a wallet? Or biggest pain points?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Brice Yan
@xby
It requires support at the standard layer (e.g., ERC-20) or an additional transaction signed by the EOA.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
