Working on Farcaster and Warpcast. Longer thoughts at https://dwr.email

weekly occurrence:
guy ferociously arguing a point @dwr.eth already closed the case on in blog post 3 years ago

i specifically waited to send this at a moment when there wasn’t an active one I knew about to avoid subcasting

Building @warpcast and @farcaster / dad / like to read, cook, ski, code

usually ends with a slightly sharp but otherwise polite explanation followed by a complaint that farcaster silences dissenters (doesn’t recast and implement their debunked idea)

my mental model is if argues it with more than 20 people on the TL it goes to his blog

haha there should be a notion at this point just for these topics.

Elite timing.
Feels like a rite of passage at this point, debate, realize dwr.eth already dissected it, retreat quietly.

if we could all have the patience that Dan has, there would be world peace

You should curate a canon of @dwr.eth of the arguing party and the case closed like Rob Bensiger did with readthesequences.com

Feels like every maturing protocol hits this stage, recurring debates from newcomers vs long-settled principles. Makes me think… how can we preserve Farcaster history better?

HAHAHA the dangers of inadvertent subcasting