building degencast.wtf /degencast . ex-bitmain, binance

Chiang Mai, Mueang Chiang Mai District, Chiang Mai, Thailand

Great idea. Bad documentation. I think a Cosmos for Ceramic will be more successful. 

You need something a bit more customizable based on your data type. Also, it only enforces data types but not other “read/write” permissions. 

I like Tableland.xyz

Chasing Curiosity. Empathetic Accelerationist. Founding Fullstack Engineer @icebreaker. YC S16, KB7. 
icbk.me/tayyab.fc

tableland access control is definitely superior than ceramic. just don't like the fact write need to be onchain.. https://i.imgur.com/NKI1rnr.jpg

Hey, member of the tableland team here. Would love to hear your thoughts on alternatives to on-chain mutations. We've been exploring alternatives like ipfs hashes and other forms of verifiable off-chain data "dumps". Would love to hear your usecases for this type of thing!

Leading research @textile. Reading, writing, arithmetic.

how does the value prop of threadsdb compare to tableland? are they related in any way at all?

@carsonfarmer how does ceramic compare with threadDB or orbitDB tho? You probably get asked a lot about this ?  Understanding that tableland went for a different set of tradeoffs. But ThreadDB in lots of ways are in the same category with Ceramic and OrbitDB?

Not really in any practical sense. Two very different approaches to the problem of distributed data. ThreadDB was designed for pure p2p sync, whereas Tableland network will end up being more federated. ThreadDB relies on peers to make data available, whereas Tableland relies on blockchains for data availability...