Liang @ degencast.wtf π©
@degencast.eth
gm! thought on ceramic.network ?
4 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Liang @ degencast.wtf π©
@degencast.eth
@mintit
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Tayyab - d/acc
@tayyab
Great idea. Bad documentation. I think a Cosmos for Ceramic will be more successful. You need something a bit more customizable based on your data type. Also, it only enforces data types but not other βread/writeβ permissions. I like Tableland.xyz
6 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Adam Dawson
@adamdawson
I wrote about it once upon a time; can't remember if this was ever published formally π https://docs.google.com/document/d/1v57pDmDSuqavDBg92ZnHp5fu6LrtoFcq1KhlJ2XaTnY/edit?usp=drivesdk
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Adam Dawson
@adamdawson
Ceramic has some neat ideas for data portability, basically doing to just about any app what Farcaster and other social protocols are doing for online interaction. Eg a set of agreed standard data elements for fitness tracking, enabling a plethora of apps to be built on top and allowing users to switch between them
3 replies
0 recast
0 reaction