Liang @ degencast.wtf π©
@degencast.eth
gm! thought on ceramic.network ?
4 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Adam Dawson
@adamdawson
Ceramic has some neat ideas for data portability, basically doing to just about any app what Farcaster and other social protocols are doing for online interaction. Eg a set of agreed standard data elements for fitness tracking, enabling a plethora of apps to be built on top and allowing users to switch between them
3 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Liang @ degencast.wtf π©
@degencast.eth
although I am not sure 'anchor' data on chain is the best way for conflict resolution comparing to crdt
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Liang @ degencast.wtf π©
@degencast.eth
exactly my impression. fc did so much heavy lifting for one protocol, solving problems like identity, auth, data availabilty and consistency using hubs and crdt stuffs.. ceramic make those effort reuseable!
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Deepu
@deepu
Neat ideas but unless they make a popular client first, donβt see ceramic taking off . I think building a great client alongside the FC protocol is one of the genius decisions by @dwr.eth .
5 replies
0 recast
0 reaction