Liang @ degencast.wtf 🎩
@degencast.eth
gm! thought on ceramic.network ?
4 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Adam Dawson
@adamdawson
Ceramic has some neat ideas for data portability, basically doing to just about any app what Farcaster and other social protocols are doing for online interaction. Eg a set of agreed standard data elements for fitness tracking, enabling a plethora of apps to be built on top and allowing users to switch between them
3 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Deepu
@deepu
Neat ideas but unless they make a popular client first, don’t see ceramic taking off . I think building a great client alongside the FC protocol is one of the genius decisions by @dwr.eth .
5 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Liang @ degencast.wtf 🎩
@degencast.eth
It is more difficulty to make a client for them because they are more "general purpose". But currently the main focus is DID and user-center data
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Liang @ degencast.wtf 🎩
@degencast.eth
good point. the fact ceramic being more general makes it more difficult to create useful client
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
David Furlong
@df
yeah agreed. I tried to use ceramic a couple months back and there was literally no working app on top of it that I could find to even test it out. There were some broken hackathon projects that I tried that didn’t work
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
billzh
@billzh
Agree on this, but does Gitcoin Passport count as a Ceramic client?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Azi | zo.me | */acc
@azi
This is the biggest differentiator imo with Farcaster
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
