Liang @ degencast.wtf 🎩 pfp
Liang @ degencast.wtf 🎩
@degencast.eth
gm! thought on ceramic.network ?
4 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Tayyab - d/acc pfp
Tayyab - d/acc
@tayyab
Great idea. Bad documentation. I think a Cosmos for Ceramic will be more successful. You need something a bit more customizable based on your data type. Also, it only enforces data types but not other “read/write” permissions. I like Tableland.xyz
6 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Tayyab - d/acc pfp
Tayyab - d/acc
@tayyab
I spent a few weeks trying to build on ceramic. Limitations are well limiting.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Liang @ degencast.wtf 🎩 pfp
Liang @ degencast.wtf 🎩
@degencast.eth
does https://useorbis.com/ looks like Cosmos for ceramic?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Liang @ degencast.wtf 🎩 pfp
Liang @ degencast.wtf 🎩
@degencast.eth
more customizable means rules/function to control how state could be changed? read/write permission is indeed super limited, as only stream owner could write and its hard to model state that's mutated by multiple parties. basically you need cqrs patterns to model multicontroller state
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Liang @ degencast.wtf 🎩 pfp
Liang @ degencast.wtf 🎩
@degencast.eth
what does cosmos for ceramic look like? you mean cosmossdk that allow you to roll your own? what do you like about tableland? My impression is that it requires onchain tx to change access?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Yash Karthik pfp
Yash Karthik
@yashkarthik
haven't read too much, but love the story telling aspect of it lol
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Liang @ degencast.wtf 🎩 pfp
Liang @ degencast.wtf 🎩
@degencast.eth
tableland access control is definitely superior than ceramic. just don't like the fact write need to be onchain.. https://i.imgur.com/NKI1rnr.jpg
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction