Liang @ degencast.wtf 🎩
@degencast.eth
gm! thought on ceramic.network ?
4 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Tayyab - d/acc
@tayyab
Great idea. Bad documentation. I think a Cosmos for Ceramic will be more successful. You need something a bit more customizable based on your data type. Also, it only enforces data types but not other “read/write” permissions. I like Tableland.xyz
6 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Liang @ degencast.wtf 🎩
@degencast.eth
what does cosmos for ceramic look like? you mean cosmossdk that allow you to roll your own? what do you like about tableland? My impression is that it requires onchain tx to change access?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Tayyab - d/acc
@tayyab
The incentives don’t work. If I build an app that bootstraps valuable data for them, I don’t retain any value. Plus I the control from my previous reply. Mental model for tableland is simple (it’s a db). I think for valuable data on chain txns are fine, especially if rolled up in the action you are taking.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
