Liang @ degencast.wtf π©
@degencast.eth
gm! thought on ceramic.network ?
4 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Adam Dawson
@adamdawson
Ceramic has some neat ideas for data portability, basically doing to just about any app what Farcaster and other social protocols are doing for online interaction. Eg a set of agreed standard data elements for fitness tracking, enabling a plethora of apps to be built on top and allowing users to switch between them
3 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Deepu
@deepu
Neat ideas but unless they make a popular client first, donβt see ceramic taking off . I think building a great client alongside the FC protocol is one of the genius decisions by @dwr.eth .
5 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Liang @ degencast.wtf π©
@degencast.eth
It is more difficulty to make a client for them because they are more "general purpose". But currently the main focus is DID and user-center data
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Deepu
@deepu
Yea but they should start with the best use case first and collaborate with someone on that . Most platforms start as a product which are then expanded into platforms .
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction