Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

Barry pfp
Barry
@baz.eth
Hey all - just wanted to share some of my concerns about the public nature of our casts/behavior on FC. Hoping for an open dialogue on where we think this is headed, and in the long run, how to provide privacy protections from a user content perspective. https://paragraph.xyz/@barrycollier/farcaster-content-graph
20 replies
9 recasts
72 reactions

Ivy pfp
Ivy
@ivy
this is at odds with the permissionless north star
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

Barry pfp
Barry
@baz.eth
Yeah, I understand do you think the concern about how it will be abused is valid, or do you believe that all of your personal content being publicly available will never be abused? because I’ve pointed to some historical examples of how lack of privacy ends badly I think there are models to satisfy both goals
3 replies
0 recast
3 reactions

Frank pfp
Frank
@deboboy
“all of your personal content” doesn’t sound accurate; people share what they want but likely it’s a small percentage of the totality of their content/data
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Barry pfp
Barry
@baz.eth
The article spells out how little data it takes I just analyzed a few hundred of my casts to create a decent personality profile Do this at scale across millions of FIDs (as FC scales) and I have a clear path to segmentation and targeting Not concerned about my individual privacy, but about the impact at scale
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions