Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
Barry
@baz.eth
Hey all - just wanted to share some of my concerns about the public nature of our casts/behavior on FC. Hoping for an open dialogue on where we think this is headed, and in the long run, how to provide privacy protections from a user content perspective. https://paragraph.xyz/@barrycollier/farcaster-content-graph
18 replies
12 recasts
51 reactions
Poison Ivy
@ivy
this is at odds with the permissionless north star
1 reply
0 recast
6 reactions
Barry
@baz.eth
Yeah, I understand do you think the concern about how it will be abused is valid, or do you believe that all of your personal content being publicly available will never be abused? because I’ve pointed to some historical examples of how lack of privacy ends badly I think there are models to satisfy both goals
3 replies
0 recast
6 reactions
Poison Ivy
@ivy
it's a valid concern, it's going to be abused and i'm not concerned about it being abused in current year you have to assume that AI or something is going to scrape publicly available data, farcaster is far past the 'private clubhouse' era
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Frank
@deboboy
“all of your personal content” doesn’t sound accurate; people share what they want but likely it’s a small percentage of the totality of their content/data
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Poison Ivy
@ivy
further to that is that we are still in the benevolent dictator era which means using farcaster implies you are on board with merkle / @dwr.eth and @v north stars, one of the biggest of which is permissionless but even if that wasn't true i don't think a proposal for privacy by design would win on votes rn
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
