Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
✳️ dcposch on daimo
@dcposch.eth
The Manhattan Project cost $12b ($800m at the time), less than half the Merced-to-Bakersfield train currently under construction (which is also taking much longer)
6 replies
0 recast
50 reactions
bark bark
@king
Shell corpo by local politicians extracting wealth from the treasury. What do you call those parasites?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
GIGAMΞSH
@gigamesh
I toured a nuclear silo converted into a museum recently and the tour guide said each silo cost about $12 million at the time. Granted it was in the 60s & 70s, but still seemed incredibly cheap considering the insane engineering & materials required.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Adam
@adam-
The more contractors in the mix, the longer the project takes. How many subcontractors do you think the Manhattan project had? I guarantee you its less than the train project.
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
jj 🛟
@jj
https://patrickcollison.com/fast List of things we used to do incredibly fast.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Bravo Johnson
@bravojohnson
A large bunch of Captains of Industry took Leave of Absence to work for the government for $1 a year. Maybe that helps with the math
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
matt 💭
@matthewmorek
UK’s HS2 line from London to Manchester has entered the chat with estimated £72-98bn ($90-120bn USD) total cost for a 140 miles of railway
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction