Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Elad pfp
Elad
@el4d
Nouns Governor design challenge We found a bad attack vector, and don't love any of the mitigations. Please read and help us be smarter! (rounds.wtf starts tomorrow morning) https://mirror.xyz/verbsteam.eth/gnTdSqqiZC7OmqL8Dix-hEek5Sim1abC1BsZNm9_h-s
3 replies
16 recasts
39 reactions

wiz pfp
wiz
@wiz
hard one. how important is preserving stale delegations (after a noun has been transferred)? same attack vector exists with nouns on nft exchanges right?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

david pfp
david
@davidbr
not sure exactly what you mean by preserving stale delegations. I think upon a noun transfer we could be ok with reseting the delegation or keeping the original one. on NFT exchanges the attack is slightly reduced because buying and selling will usually cost you the spread between the bid & the ask
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Spencer Perkins pfp
Spencer Perkins
@spencerperkins.eth
NDT could prevent the stale delegation issue all together just by storing the Noun owner upon delegation. For an NDT to submit a vote, require that the current Noun owner is the same as stored by the NDT. https://warpcast.com/spencerperkins.eth/0xa3bda16b
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction