Dassem Ultor
@dassemultor
151 Following
136 Followers
20 replies
17 recasts
135 reactions
2 replies
6 recasts
74 reactions
During the discussion about the Ordering FIP, we practically identified three different network state models, and I think we should be aware of them. Each one has its pros and cons, and makes some use cases simpler and some harder.
- Global-state oriented (current model, most probably future model too)
- User-state oriented
- App-state oriented
Depending on how current and future apps want to use the network, each model offers advantages and disadvantages.
For example, for a twitter-like app, think Warpcast and Supercast, the global-state oriented model is the best fit.
If you're interested in knowing what only specific users do and not the whole network, a user-state model would be a better fit.
And if you mostly care about what users do within a special-purpose app (@kmacb.eth's d33m.com comes to mind, or maybe a channel-specific app like @purple has been discussing for some time) then an app-specific model seems better. 5 replies
2 recasts
16 reactions
0 reply
1 recast
10 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
38 replies
84 recasts
280 reactions
4 replies
1 recast
43 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
49 replies
9 recasts
117 reactions
21 replies
11 recasts
124 reactions
45 replies
32 recasts
263 reactions
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
92 replies
66 recasts
630 reactions
32 replies
33 recasts
288 reactions
56 replies
20 recasts
153 reactions
184 replies
204 recasts
1188 reactions
13 replies
14 recasts
49 reactions
65 replies
18 recasts
97 reactions
94 replies
82 recasts
600 reactions
