Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

​woj pfp
​woj
@woj.eth
ok the fast approval of EIP-7514 actually makes me question the ethereum credible neutrality for the first time ever if this goes live in Dencun, it clearly shows that the core devs can push changes to the network at will
12 replies
1 recast
11 reactions

Dankrad Feist pfp
Dankrad Feist
@dankrad
I think this is a very interesting question. I was very ambivalent about this EIP myself -- initially I was against it but changed my mind as it being the best thing to do right now, precisely because the hard fork process is very slow and drawn out.
2 replies
1 recast
4 reactions

​woj pfp
​woj
@woj.eth
thanks for replying here @dankrad, i really appreciate it >I also think that we need to be able to coordinate much quicker than we do today, on the order of days not weeks. what improvements to the process / ecosystem would you make to achieve it? happy to contribute some time, code or content to help
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Dankrad Feist pfp
Dankrad Feist
@dankrad
I don't have an answer. But look at optimistic rollups with a typically 7 day fraud proof window. Current expectation is that in the face of a censorship attack, Ethereum could fix this and fork in that time span to recover. Requiring that an EIP needs "x week community consideration" seems wrong in this light.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Dankrad Feist pfp
Dankrad Feist
@dankrad
I would love to have more of a community call in addition to ACDs, where members can give their inputs on their priorities. I think this is completely missing at the moment. But just "extending the timelines" is precisely not what we should do.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction