Danica Swanson
@danicaswanson
Dropped from ~6300 to 4100 follower count with the Warpcast changes, but hardly noticed since a lot of my time on FC is spent in group chats that are much more high-signal for me than algo feeds. I think a lot about how we might take some of that group chat energy public in ways that might help Farcaster thrive, but still don't have a good answer.
8 replies
0 recast
17 reactions
artlu 🎩
@artlu
would love to hear if you think SassyHash could help. One key use case is to move certain groupchats to a channel. Only channel members can write in channel, and only channel members can decode what people choose to encode. Imagine you agree to meet friends in Times Square and everyone in the group gets a Cone of Silence, which they can choose to use or not.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Adam
@adam-
Maybe that energy really works best within a certain setting/group size, and thats what makes it special? Some energy is best felt in certain settings, and there's a trade off of potentially diminishing that energy if its attempted at scale.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Wwor1d
@wwor1d
Do you think the groups are good because they are closed so people are happier to speak their minds?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
BrightFutureGuy 🎩↑Ⓜ️
@bfg
agree with the sentiment, also don't have a good idea how to do it. But it feels that energy from groupchats could help improve signal and algo standing for everyone involved, if only it would be "on the timeline" without too much external noise (understand bots).
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
TrishD
@trishd
/microsub tip: 74 $DEGEN
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
marlo
@marlo
/microsub tip: 21 $DEGEN
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
trewkat
@trewkat.eth
/microsub tip: 10 $DEGEN
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Trish🫧
@trish
/microsub tip: 188 $DEGEN
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
