Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

czar  pfp
czar
@czar
have been away for a bit, but I have no idea why we need a namespace like basenames. why have names for every chain. don’t we already have ENS.
4 replies
0 recast
8 reactions

Jorge Pablo Franetovic 🎩 pfp
Jorge Pablo Franetovic 🎩
@jpfraneto.eth
we don’t need it
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

agusti 🐘 pfp
agusti 🐘
@bleu.eth
I think it's mostly marketing + cost hopefully ENSv2 brings ENS usage to L2's and makes ENS useful again. Im not gonna pay 20$ usd to update my PFP on mainnet each week
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

shawked.eth pfp
shawked.eth
@shawked.eth
I think base names are great marketing, imo. New users typically gravitate towards platforms like coinbase. From there, the rabbit hole begins. ➡️ coinbase wallet ➡️ base name ➡️ ens My first (and worst) digital identity was on UD and I didn’t know anything else existed until the ens token got listed on major CEX. And so the rabbit hole with ens began.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Jesus pfp
Jesus
@n4k4moto
I think with ENS is enough
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction