Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/farcasterunion
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Njal pfp
Njal
@cryptonjal
@mvr even added a graph to it. I have looked at the multiple correlations with regression analyses. - When I calculate the multiple correlation of 0 or 2 with other variables, they appear to have no significant correlation between 0 en 2. These are clearly different groups. - In a regression analysis between 1 and the other variables (0, 2 and time), all variables are significant and 2 plays a greater role than 0. This seems to indicate that in label 1 the chance of spammy accounts is greater than for non-spammy accounts (a factor of 5.6). Strictly speaking, too simplistic, but still an indication in my opinion.
4 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

Njal pfp
Njal
@cryptonjal
Just to make sure, I mean that my analyse is simplistic.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Njal pfp
Njal
@cryptonjal
Just have to say that label 1 is not much better than knowing nothing at all. In the complete data set with all casters, the factor between label 0, and 2 is 3.6.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Pichi πŸŸͺπŸ–πŸΉπŸŽ© 🍑🌸 pfp
Pichi πŸŸͺπŸ–πŸΉπŸŽ© 🍑🌸
@pichi
This is some fabulous analysis! Thank you for sharing! 1000 $DEGEN
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Cryptopxelβ“‚οΈπŸŽ©πŸ–πŸŽ­πŸ“Ί pfp
Cryptopxelβ“‚οΈπŸŽ©πŸ–πŸŽ­πŸ“Ί
@iamjdeenft
Wow...
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction