Nouns

One Noun, every day, forever.

nouns.wtf

We have updated NounSwap.wtf to accommodate the recent proposal threshold change. 

In the case someone using NounSwap only has 1 Noun, it will create a candidate proposal for the swap. If it gains interest, another Noun holder can step in to sponsor to create an onchain proposal.

nice! thoughts on finding ways to reduce the need for governance here?

Thanks! We defiantly would love to. We're at a point now where we have built what we can permissionlessly but to take it to the next level and require no governance we would need the support from the DAO.

i think if you could come up with a gov minimized solution your prop would be very compelling

What if Noun Swap fees were actually an auction where the DAO only configures that start price?

I think it's exciting to see people competing for their forever Nouns

Wdyt @toadyhawk.eth?

Agreed. Our thought here is to first determine if Nouners want to swap and use it in its current form. (find PMF)

Then we would want to propose a permissionless version to scale it. We have been thinking a lot about merging the v2 we proposed in prop 457 with this idea from @el4d.

working on nouns protocol ⌐◨-◨ https://mirror.xyz/verbsteam.eth

Agreed. Our thought here is to first determine if Nouners want to swap and use it in its current form. (find PMF)

Then we would want to propose a permissionless version to scale it. We have been thinking a lot about merging the v2 we proposed in prop 457 with this idea from @el4d.
https://warpcast.com/el4d/0xc02a9a79

Definitely could be, feels a bit like a chicken and egg problem. 

I’d say we’re bit hesitant to put up a prop again without any swap props attempts.

what if people want to swap, but they can’t use it in the current state because they don’t want to clog up governance?