bloke pfp

bloke

@cloaked-bloke

47 Following
26 Followers
bloke pfp
bloke
@cloaked-bloke
now that’s cool. do you use nostr? what type of content can i expect to find there?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
bloke pfp
bloke
@cloaked-bloke
you should check this out, it’s a really cool way of presenting content https://warpcast.com/xh3b4sd.eth/0x686899ba
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
bloke pfp
bloke
@cloaked-bloke
hmm i like it, and look forward to your analysis on industries. it corroborates my thinking with social networks. Whichever protocol or currency enables the most things to be built around it, will have the highest gravity.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
bloke pfp
bloke
@cloaked-bloke
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/philosophy.en.html fsf.org
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
bloke pfp
bloke
@cloaked-bloke
fsf membership 20/mo they provide a private forum where i can guarantee high quality opinions from a perspective im interested in
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
bloke pfp
bloke
@cloaked-bloke
NS equivalent of church/cityhall
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
bloke pfp
bloke
@cloaked-bloke
i haven’t seen anyone present content using obsidian. This is really cool I found I was able to digest the information a lot quicker when I chose which direction to travel, rather than linear consumption. about the graph, the way we simplify existence creates a push pull dynamic in me- on one hand, everything is so damn simple… on the other, everything is incredibly complex. Going to read more of this, but from what I gauge, you see it as both?? - a result of concepts like cellular autonoma?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
bloke pfp
bloke
@cloaked-bloke
hows the nether hot sauce?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
bloke pfp
bloke
@cloaked-bloke
proof of passion - an interviewee can walk an interviewer through his or her personal knowledge graph, segmented by topic. ex. if the individual claims to be an expert on open source software, they should already have a dense network of notes / work devoted to subsegment ‘software licensing methodologies’
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
bloke pfp
bloke
@cloaked-bloke
i appreciate the invite yes hmm the minimal knowledge i have is for how on chain orderbooks work, and i was trying to connect the two but this seems like offchain pair management… hmm so the only connection i have is the formula x*y=k i will have to read up more on these uniswap algos. it seems complicated to me if i don’t know how to implement it myself. kudos to you for understanding
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
bloke pfp
bloke
@cloaked-bloke
Zettelkasten PKMS makes writing fun(er)
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
bloke pfp
bloke
@cloaked-bloke
i read daily stoic with dad. we talk about it briefly everyday.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
bloke pfp
bloke
@cloaked-bloke
i’m just getting into AMM now, so please let me know if i am understanding this correctly. you are saying this for the use case: liquidity providers do not have to lock up as much capital to prop up the price? The promise is still there for BIDs, but this statement implies liquidity is provided on an ‘as needed basis’, thus allowing the providers to more strategically use money when it’s not needed.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
bloke pfp
bloke
@cloaked-bloke
throwing some thoughts in here. “destructiveness inversely correlates with the blockage of growth of man’s sensuous emotional and intellectual capabilities” yes. the books you mention are the type to throw in someday maybe category. I respect your journey to all in a specific subject, i’m sure it’ll be worth it I picked up this one, because I had a friend tell me it’s his all time favorite book.Always read a book when there’s such enthusiasm, just very difficult to find time. other news: A good friend creating a philosophy book club for my friendgroup here. i’m not sure the group is interested. i’ll support him, but cannot display emotion… must remain stoic… 😐 If you have any favorite philosophy books, or sci fi, please share. random thought I wonder how psychology relates to philosophy… they seem similar to me.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
bloke pfp
bloke
@cloaked-bloke
there seems a decent amount i do not understand yet. maybe i’ll ujdersrand what you mean by entropy later in book. thank you
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
bloke pfp
bloke
@cloaked-bloke
what’s your go to response here? “you’re welcome” or “no problem”
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
bloke pfp
bloke
@cloaked-bloke
hey, I am not into all this coin biz TBH… I don’t see how me owning something benefits anyone other than providing liquidity for someone else to take out. Which, if you want money I’d be willing to tip responses rather than this round about way. The question I have is from your book / vibes, it seems you idolize collective consciousness over centralized summarization. ie social network over LLM Do you see it possible for a social network, to transform into a more LLM-like neural network, by human driven connections? Ex. we manually connect best baseball player to babe ruth, AROD, etc. I am wondering if what your book is going to get-at is a perspective that humans can make a better LLM.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
bloke pfp
bloke
@cloaked-bloke
yes! they fail or strikeout 6/10 of time, but they simply ‘fail less’ than everyone else
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
bloke pfp
bloke
@cloaked-bloke
impossible problems require delusional solutions
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
bloke pfp
bloke
@cloaked-bloke
I am reading the same book right now, and it has been a tough read. 50% through, on pages claiming that the authoritarian character is actually a perpetual submittor to forces higher than oneself. Whether it be the economy, a boss, a spouse, etc. curious-how did you find out about this book?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction