Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
"Why do you keep telling people what to do?" "Stop being a hall monitor!" "People aren't going to change." Sure, but better to be clear upfront when we start tweak the spam labeling algorithms. re: hall monitor — yes, I am. Quality is what drives growth, that requires rules and taste. If you don't like those rules / taste, use or build another client. Beauty of a decentralized system. And to be clear: if you're just casting in your own timeline or channels, algo won't care about it. It's when you start taxing other people's attention (and potentially making the experience worse for others), that you might get labeled.
29 replies
3 recasts
64 reactions
Chinmay 🕹️🍿
@chinmay.eth
What if instead of incentivizing for engagement, we can incentivize the identification of spam 🤔. Would that reduce spam?
6 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Jason Goldberg Ⓜ️ 💜
@betashop.eth
I’d rather have a network that has the problem of too many people trying vs too many people tuning out
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Jason Goldberg Ⓜ️ 💜
@betashop.eth
How should we structure rewards for la policia?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Cyber Shakti 🎩😇😈💃
@cybershakti
No :( Better incentivising good content please
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Blinky Stitt
@flashprofits.eth
That definitely incentivizes spam.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Metaphorical Leo
@hyp
been saying this all day, don’t incentivize what people already do for social reasons, that just creates noise for natively fun, positive, activities! incentivize things that are good for the network that they normally wouldn’t do. you don’t pay friends to come over and hang out, but you would pay someone to mow your lawn! if you start paying people to come hang out, but not mow your lawn, you’ll soon want to leave your own house!
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Pika
@pika-sol
This would definitely be better
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
