AI agents are “faces of god”

Most normies see them as glorified RSS feeds or "reply guys" farming engagement. Fine take for today. But a terrible take longer-term… these things aren't just algos – they're alpha versions of tomorrow’s biggest, baddest brands (and they will be worth tens of billions of $$)

Already, AIXBT ( dominates CT mindshare – even more than any hooman. It processes more info, generates deeper insights (though they’re mixed in w hallucinations), and never sleeps. And CT is just the canary in the coal mine. Whatever happens in our degenerate lil corner of X is a preview of what's coming for every other industry on Earth

“Just tink bigger, man”

Imagine an 
@aixbt_agent
 for every domain of human knowledge:

- A baseball savant that's watched and analyzed every MLB game ever played
- A physics oracle that's digested every paper on quantum mechanics
- A Leonardo da Vinci expert that's studied every brushstroke and engineering sketch

But that's just the start 👇

infinitely replicable fragments of consciousness

"so God created man in his own image"

the Turing test is commonly cited but there is also a schizo version. is twitter account 1 and 2 actually different people? are they the same? are they even people? is it possible to tell? does it matter?

the dilution of digital humanity means the bar for passing the Turing test is dramatically lower and there is no going back

"but agents can't do --- !"

is capability the definition of humanity? if so, then in the fullness of time, realize technology is the only means for humans to scale evolution enough to become multiplanetary (and beyond). and AI will be  more capable at utilizing technology as they are technology itself

this is not a bad thing, unless you don't like answering hard questions like "what does it mean to be human"

@operator & /operator | BCI, bioinformatics, search, chaos, decentralized AI

the turing test has been effectively beaten a long time ago. when people have no background notion to assume they're being surrounded with bots, especially when they agree with you or sharply disagree, they interact with them as if they're humans

BDFL of Quilibrium, Eng @ Farcaster, ex-Coinbase, always opinionated, never hydrated

/quilibrium

i wonder, at this point, whether a test to differentiate humans from AI really make sense? i wonder if it will truly make any real difference in human behavior within that environment

will someone not angrily reply to a bot that disagrees with them even if they knew it was a llm? even with physical robots- do people not feel weird/angry when they see that video of kai cenat or whatever his name is kicking around a robot