Liang @ degencast.wtf 🎩
@degencast.eth
gm! thought on ceramic.network ?
4 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Tayyab - d/acc
@tayyab
Great idea. Bad documentation. I think a Cosmos for Ceramic will be more successful. You need something a bit more customizable based on your data type. Also, it only enforces data types but not other “read/write” permissions. I like Tableland.xyz
6 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Liang @ degencast.wtf 🎩
@degencast.eth
tableland access control is definitely superior than ceramic. just don't like the fact write need to be onchain.. https://i.imgur.com/NKI1rnr.jpg
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
cjqf
@carsonfarmer
Hey, member of the tableland team here. Would love to hear your thoughts on alternatives to on-chain mutations. We've been exploring alternatives like ipfs hashes and other forms of verifiable off-chain data "dumps". Would love to hear your usecases for this type of thing!
4 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Liang @ degencast.wtf 🎩
@degencast.eth
possible to make it such that access control is on-chain while data mutation is done offchain
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
cjqf
@carsonfarmer
Yeh I mean this is an amazing super power. We like to think of this as "mutable data with immutable (access) rules". I love that. Smart Contracts to control contract-level behavior (access control) and off-chain nodes to support storage and adherence to said contracts. Beautiful!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction