Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/clanker
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
alex
@proxystudio.eth
jesse: if Yon launched gdupi today as a ‘content coin’ on Zora, would it be considered a success? would it validate your thesis about content coins + zora? yon has earned (going by today’s prices) >$25,000 from $GDUPI rewards total creator rewards on (post-coin) zora are ~$460,000 Yon has individually earned ~5.5% of creator rewards earned by ~all~ zora coin creators. he is incredible btw, as you know and we’ve discussed. he earned these rewards because of his own exceptional efforts, talent, with some minor help on our side with distribution. just trying to understand: what about Yon’s experience leads you to believe that many more coins = a better model for artists? he basically did the opposite of some of the content coin stuff you’ve describe. Yon very much stepped up to seize the opportunity / obligation of creating cool work around the coin. and what about it tells you zora is the platform to help them do so vs. clanker? slightly confused as to the reference there.
13 replies
10 recasts
92 reactions
BrixBountyFarm 🎩
@brixbounty
I think a “hybrid” approach for selling content might work. $BUU did something like this back in the fall with a raffle style entry for pfp art was priced in $BUU & $SOL; if you didn’t have BUU you could one click a sol price and it would swap to BUU as part of the ticket. What was unique in my mind is it created an income stream in an asset other than the meme token, while also driving demand for the token. Ultimately pricing in a meme token for the creator means they have to sell the token to receive revenue which isn’t great imo. Personally think if Yon wanted to he could drive demand for gdupi with one of ones etc priced in usdc and gdupi and or eth and gdupi. Also think 404s can be explored here, where artists could charge a fee upon redemption of nfts - though that goes back to using the underlying asset. If I’m yon or another artist w a legit following I’m not keen to split trading fees a la Zora; I want the lion share for artists. https://x.com/buu_solana/status/1853453799337373907
2 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
alex
@proxystudio.eth
Some cool ideas here! I think that’s the wrong mental model for fee splits fwiw Almost no reason to use a creation platform if they aren’t helping you get more attention, distribution and earn far more than you would have otherwise The primary determinant of rewards earned is higher volume over longer time frames, not split %.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
yerbearserker.base.eth 🧉🎯
@yerbearserker
Now this is something I really want to do and have been thinking about since prior to Empire launch I want an NFT creating interface with a few set recipes that would serve Empires (& creators in general but ofc I'm looking through the Creator Empire lens) by doing something like allowing them to create a 1/1 auction collection that requires a min price be hit before going live, and split the primary and secondary fees between the creator/artist & their Empire Treasury Then another option is non-auction, just fixed price. They could drop a collection of 1/1s. Same splits. Or they could do a fixed price or increasing price per mint, collection of 1/1s over time. Same splits. Or a generative collection with a large amount (at lower price, larger volume), and split between creator and treasury. Treasury holds funds, rewards token holders + collectors/community members, allowing for easy ranking, marketing events, etc. I don't feel that fractionalizing an art piece massively & having the price so low is👍
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
