Bravo Johnson
@bravojohnson
Nuclear power looks cheap—right up until you factor in the part where you have to mothball the reactor for a hundred years, entomb the waste in some geologically stable crypt, and pray your great-grandkids don’t get irradiated by a budget cut. The sticker price on a kilowatt-hour is a joke, a little accounting fiction that conveniently ignores the back-end costs, because if you actually priced in decommissioning, storage, and the inevitable government bailouts, nuclear would be about as ‘cheap’ as launching your local power plant into orbit. But hey, that’s the magic of privatization of profits and socializing the fallout.
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
Monteluna
@monteluna
This is just statements appealing to fear. Much of my undergrad was learning from and working with top nuclear physicists. Much of the current political narrative is fictitious "worst case" scenario thinking that generates headlines and taps into fear responses of people. Entombing radioactive material has happened for almost 100 years now with no issues. The gains are measurable as cheaper energy allows for human flourishing, and absolutely has measurable quality of life improvements. I can also tell you first hand I haven't met a single person in energy that isn't working hard to make the best outcome, something I can at least compare with the crypto industry as I've met people who will look you straight in the face and tell you they are scamming you or someone else, and think its a flex. The previous bad outcomes are statistically still better than flying a commercial airline, and the benefits outweigh the risks. There are risks, but its *not* worth not doing it.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Metaphorical
@hyp
If only wind turbines weren’t carcinogenic.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
