Nouns

One Noun, every day, forever.

nouns.wtf

I think it’s kind of funny that the 10% threshold prop didn’t pass…. Why is it funny? Because for the last year many have been claiming we’re ’under attack from the big bad arbers’ & that ‘arbers have been accumulating’ …. Well guess what, if there were any arbers don’t you think they would have voted FOR the proposal to lower threshold so they could get out early 😂 As I said, we’re scared of a boogie monster under our bed which doesn’t exist. 🤦🏼‍♀️

I’d say run it back for 15% @coleperkins & let the honest majority leave if there would even be 106 Nouns to enter…. Let’s remember only 28 votes FOR, so it maybe unlikely to even get 106.

Just A Girl & Her Cryptos 💙 GLOOM Enjoyoooor 👽 Gloomer /gloomtoken - FID: 20147.

ultra-wealthy internet explorer &
 dota 2 champ

The Duna doesn’t really affect me as a doxxed tax paying American, but can understand why some people in other countries may not want to participate…. The fork was put in place to protect an honest majority…. I think the 28 who voted FOR have honest intentions… most just voted in support but would be unlikely to fork themselves …. My guess is, the threshold gets lowered & there’s not even enough Nouns who join to trigger it 🤷🏼‍♀️

Damn u really trying to flip that noun already??

Crypto, nouns, malleable software, interfaces, running. // working on @agora // https://0xmcg.com // /the-pond

Yea I just think it looks better for optics if the DAO isn’t trying to act as a blocker for an honest minority exit… if there were truly arbers waiting in the wings with all of these new anon wallets they would have come out to vote the 10% through. That clearly didn’t happen.

> I’d say run it back for 15%

ya the problem with this is I don't think there would even be enough of an honest minority to get to 15% -- even 10% seems challenging

The biggest ‘arber’ would be Wags & if he forked he’d be at a loss of hundreds of thousands of dollars which is why he wants fair exit…. Fair exit would essentially allow everyone a refund on a time decay and would surely send the treasury as close to zero as we’ve ever seen…. Think of it in terms of Luna, once you depeg to a certain % the FUD kicks in & everyone wants out…. People seeing millions refunded will not instill confidence. I’m not sure if that’s the intention…. ‘The Great Reset’ so to speak, but I think the optics of that would be terrible & much harder to kickstart things after Duna. 

Also I’m not a fan of the Nouns that were given out to Nounders would be rendered $0 also the ones given to artists…. Secondary sales also add in a weird arb game. Just not a fan of the proposed ‘fair exit’ before the Duna idea. One final fork and let’s move forward is the cleanest option. (I honestly don’t even think there would be enough in escrow to trigger one)

if an arber already has 30% of nouns they wouldn’t need to tip their hand on the 10% prop…just keep on arbing as long as possible until a real existential prop (like DUNA) is put forth. in that sense we may still see a fork

I had my popcorn 🍿 popped & was waiting to see what was going to happen… I honestly couldn’t say with 100% certainty that certain wallets weren’t arbers. I was thinking at least 40-50 votes would be slammed down from anons or somethingggggg but when no votes came in I just kinda laughed to myself…. It’s honestly comforting to know that didn’t happen though. Like we’re not under attack, we have honest people involved who love the DAO, some may just not love or want to be apart of a US entity.

Now that we know that there is no arbitrage, it should allow voters who voted for the 10% proposal and those that voted against due to arbitrage scare to sum up enough votes to win the 10% or even 5% threshold proposal. @spencerperkins.eth send it!