Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
Bixbite 👽
@bixbite
I think it’s kind of funny that the 10% threshold prop didn’t pass…. Why is it funny? Because for the last year many have been claiming we’re ’under attack from the big bad arbers’ & that ‘arbers have been accumulating’ …. Well guess what, if there were any arbers don’t you think they would have voted FOR the proposal to lower threshold so they could get out early 😂 As I said, we’re scared of a boogie monster under our bed which doesn’t exist. 🤦🏼♀️ I’d say run it back for 15% @coleperkins & let the honest majority leave if there would even be 106 Nouns to enter…. Let’s remember only 28 votes FOR, so it maybe unlikely to even get 106.
5 replies
2 recasts
18 reactions
4156
@4156
if an arber already has 30% of nouns they wouldn’t need to tip their hand on the 10% prop…just keep on arbing as long as possible until a real existential prop (like DUNA) is put forth. in that sense we may still see a fork
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Bixbite 👽
@bixbite
The biggest ‘arber’ would be Wags & if he forked he’d be at a loss of hundreds of thousands of dollars which is why he wants fair exit…. Fair exit would essentially allow everyone a refund on a time decay and would surely send the treasury as close to zero as we’ve ever seen…. Think of it in terms of Luna, once you depeg to a certain % the FUD kicks in & everyone wants out…. People seeing millions refunded will not instill confidence. I’m not sure if that’s the intention…. ‘The Great Reset’ so to speak, but I think the optics of that would be terrible & much harder to kickstart things after Duna. Also I’m not a fan of the Nouns that were given out to Nounders would be rendered $0 also the ones given to artists…. Secondary sales also add in a weird arb game. Just not a fan of the proposed ‘fair exit’ before the Duna idea. One final fork and let’s move forward is the cleanest option. (I honestly don’t even think there would be enough in escrow to trigger one)
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
