Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
Bixbite š½
@bixbite
I think itās kind of funny that the 10% threshold prop didnāt passā¦. Why is it funny? Because for the last year many have been claiming weāre āunder attack from the big bad arbersā & that āarbers have been accumulatingā ā¦. Well guess what, if there were any arbers donāt you think they would have voted FOR the proposal to lower threshold so they could get out early š As I said, weāre scared of a boogie monster under our bed which doesnāt exist. š¤¦š¼āāļø Iād say run it back for 15% @coleperkins & let the honest majority leave if there would even be 106 Nouns to enterā¦. Letās remember only 28 votes FOR, so it maybe unlikely to even get 106.
5 replies
2 recasts
18 reactions
4156
@4156
if an arber already has 30% of nouns they wouldnāt need to tip their hand on the 10% propā¦just keep on arbing as long as possible until a real existential prop (like DUNA) is put forth. in that sense we may still see a fork
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Bixbite š½
@bixbite
The biggest āarberā would be Wags & if he forked heād be at a loss of hundreds of thousands of dollars which is why he wants fair exitā¦. Fair exit would essentially allow everyone a refund on a time decay and would surely send the treasury as close to zero as weāve ever seenā¦. Think of it in terms of Luna, once you depeg to a certain % the FUD kicks in & everyone wants outā¦. People seeing millions refunded will not instill confidence. Iām not sure if thatās the intentionā¦. āThe Great Resetā so to speak, but I think the optics of that would be terrible & much harder to kickstart things after Duna. Also Iām not a fan of the Nouns that were given out to Nounders would be rendered $0 also the ones given to artistsā¦. Secondary sales also add in a weird arb game. Just not a fan of the proposed āfair exitā before the Duna idea. One final fork and letās move forward is the cleanest option. (I honestly donāt even think there would be enough in escrow to trigger one)
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
