Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
Bixbite š½
@bixbite
I think itās kind of funny that the 10% threshold prop didnāt passā¦. Why is it funny? Because for the last year many have been claiming weāre āunder attack from the big bad arbersā & that āarbers have been accumulatingā ā¦. Well guess what, if there were any arbers donāt you think they would have voted FOR the proposal to lower threshold so they could get out early š As I said, weāre scared of a boogie monster under our bed which doesnāt exist. š¤¦š¼āāļø Iād say run it back for 15% @coleperkins & let the honest majority leave if there would even be 106 Nouns to enterā¦. Letās remember only 28 votes FOR, so it maybe unlikely to even get 106.
5 replies
2 recasts
18 reactions
Fibo
@cryptonacci
Now that we know that there is no arbitrage, it should allow voters who voted for the 10% proposal and those that voted against due to arbitrage scare to sum up enough votes to win the 10% or even 5% threshold proposal. @spencerperkins.eth send it!
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Bixbite š½
@bixbite
I had my popcorn šæ popped & was waiting to see what was going to happenā¦ I honestly couldnāt say with 100% certainty that certain wallets werenāt arbers. I was thinking at least 40-50 votes would be slammed down from anons or somethingggggg but when no votes came in I just kinda laughed to myselfā¦. Itās honestly comforting to know that didnāt happen though. Like weāre not under attack, we have honest people involved who love the DAO, some may just not love or want to be apart of a US entity.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
