billzh pfp
billzh
@billzh
What does it mean to have a social network where you can't delete anything? I don't think we have quite grasped the implications yet
14 replies
0 recast
41 reactions

Varun Srinivasan pfp
Varun Srinivasan
@v
Is FC practically any different from X in this regard? In both, you can delete your content from the network, but people can preserve your content against your will be screenshotting or using APIs to download.
3 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Wesley— oss/acc pfp
Wesley— oss/acc
@wslyvh.eth
With X I only need to request them to take down my content. Even if others index it, it still gives plausible deniability (esp. with more generative content/fakes/AI, etc.). With FC and other web3 socials, easy indexing + cryptographic proofs would make it hard to completely delete (or deny)
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

billzh pfp
billzh
@billzh
This is a good point. Literally everything is undeletable & undeniable. But I'm certainly not writing off web3 social (in fact I'm insanely bullish - composability & permissless innovation is a huge upgrade for creators & devs). I'm just saying we should take privacy implications very seriously
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Wesley— oss/acc pfp
Wesley— oss/acc
@wslyvh.eth
Fully agree https://warpcast.com/wslyvh.eth/0x3a0f9c
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction