Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jason Goldberg Ⓜ️ πŸ’œ pfp
Jason Goldberg Ⓜ️ πŸ’œ
@betashop.eth
The moxie improvements launching Monday focus on promoting Farcaster network-wide high quality engagement Let’s unpack that 1. Accounts that engage with a diverse range of users βœ… 2. Engaging with users who post high quality content regularly valued by the network βœ… 2. But, quality matters. If your engagements are not appreciated, it has a negative effect ❌ How should you interpret this? 1 Engage with more people! Spread the β“‚οΈπŸ’œ around! 2 Focus your engagement on content that other people will likely find interesting. 3 But make sure your engagement is appreciated; spam is penalized in the new model.
31 replies
34 recasts
114 reactions
Dr B lizardo pfp
Dr B lizardo
@bluelizardo.eth
So, what about high-quality content that reaches fewer people?
1 reply
1 recast
4 reactions
ajrony.base.eth πŸ”΅ pfp
ajrony.base.eth πŸ”΅
@ajrony
Take a action for those who interect many times between them without any reason just for earning moxie.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Marwa πŸ”΅πŸŽ©πŸ– pfp
Marwa πŸ”΅πŸŽ©πŸ–
@marwaaslam
Is there any way to limit the farmers and prioritize the good users ?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Marcelo TerΓ§a-Nada πŸ’ŽπŸŽ©βœ¨ pfp
Marcelo TerΓ§a-Nada πŸ’ŽπŸŽ©βœ¨
@marcelonada
This looks very promising. Let's go ✨
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
AlpineLifer πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦β„οΈ pfp
AlpineLifer πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦β„οΈ
@alpinelifer
I feel like users who have a busy life and can only be here briefly will be punished by this.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
@shan.eth🐱 pfp
@shan.eth🐱
@frend.eth
Sir basically I share meme here about moxie I use many people pfp and I tag them in this meme. Is there anything wrong?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Imran β“‚οΈπŸβ“‚οΈ pfp
Imran β“‚οΈπŸβ“‚οΈ
@imran1452
That's great advice. I'll definitely focus on more engaging content and make sure my interactions are appreciated. Thanks for the tips.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Boo-caπŸ”΅πŸ”΄ pfp
Boo-caπŸ”΅πŸ”΄
@luca1111
Content that other people will likely find interesting= posting raffles?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Daxton⚫ pfp
Daxton⚫
@daxtoon.eth
LFG ...β™₯️β™₯️β™₯️
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Alex Mack πŸ”οΈ pfp
Alex Mack πŸ”οΈ
@alexmack
V cool! Also, for those of us who are launching coins or trying to share participation in others auctions, is there a way to request access to the /moxie channel? thanks!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Sheva pfp
Sheva
@sheva7.eth
Does engaging with users labeled as spam have a negative effect?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
DestinyπŸŽ©πŸ–βš‘πŸŽ­πŸ”΅βœ¨ pfp
DestinyπŸŽ©πŸ–βš‘πŸŽ­πŸ”΅βœ¨
@desibaby32
Okay hoping it all works out in a positive way
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Just Build pfp
Just Build
@justbuild
I'm going to start replyke'ing you to spread engagement πŸ˜‚
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jhon pfp
Jhon
@jhonc.eth
The big problem is the algorithm. You can publish very good content, but the algorithm will always favor old accounts. It is not expanding, it is centralizing.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
arob.base.ethπŸ–πŸŽ© pfp
arob.base.ethπŸ–πŸŽ©
@arob1000
Is there any way to keep some of the culture alive in channels like /lp where ham is exchanged daily with emojis like πŸ– x 123 without penalizing users?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
hawaii pfp
hawaii
@investanything
(extreme) farmers out!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Emily πŸŽ©πŸƒπŸ– pfp
Emily πŸŽ©πŸƒπŸ–
@mahla
Need live api for frames
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
JulietteⓂ️eon 🎩 pfp
JulietteⓂ️eon 🎩
@juliettemeon
Will there be a change in the scoring Ⓜ️oxie system?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Starllium pfp
Starllium
@benya
Will Moxie's algorithm consider engagement timing and user feedback in evaluating interaction quality?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction