Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
Stephan
@stephancill
lots of people seem to think that paying for storage on farcaster means that they won't see ads or be exploited like in web2 1. this money does not fund farcaster apps 2. while there is no serious competition for client diversity there is no inherent reason why this type of exploitation won't happen on warpcast
22 replies
3 recasts
66 reactions
Jason Goldberg โ๏ธ ๐
@betashop.eth
A % of Storage fees could also easily be pumped into moxie to reward quality content, frames developers, app developers โ with non gameable criteria
4 replies
0 recast
7 reactions
Stephan
@stephancill
i like the idea in principle. how do you come up with and enforce non-gameable criteria?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Jason Goldberg โ๏ธ ๐
@betashop.eth
Weโve got it already with casts and frames Casts earn based on who engages. The scoring system has been proven out for 3 months now. Then frames earn based on unique FIDs using the frames. But only counting FIDs with a min โnot a botโ score Can apply same to app usage. Signors. Etc.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Samuel ใ
@samuellhuber.eth
If itโs ecosystem wide how would the moxie criteria and scoring ossify? How would it extend beyond a we all trust airstack to do it (fine today, may not be in the future)
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jason Goldberg โ๏ธ ๐
@betashop.eth
We can decentralize the algos. Already in the plans.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Samuel ใ
@samuellhuber.eth
No immediate need; but needed if we do network wide sign up fee -> moxie etc Thank you for adding your thoughts ๐
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
kia
@kia
decentralize as in let people read how it works or as in let people make PRs to change how it works?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
