Farcaster

lots of people seem to think that paying for storage on farcaster means that they won't see ads or be exploited like in web2

1. this money does not fund farcaster apps
2. while there is no serious competition for client diversity there is no inherent reason why this type of exploitation won't happen on warpcast

cypherpunk wannabe, engineer working on @frames /open-frames /opencast
https://stephancill.co.za create stories at https://stories.steer.fun

A % of Storage fees could also easily be pumped into moxie to reward quality content, frames developers, app developers — with non gameable criteria

customer support @supercast

trying to sound smart /doingnumbers

building /wildcardclub

(prev. @alliance, @ycombinator, @0xppl)

@woj.eth @defikaran.eth we can experiment with this already today 

Let’s chat

We’ve got it already with casts and frames 

Casts earn based on who engages. The scoring system has been proven out for 3 months now. 

Then frames earn based on unique FIDs using the frames. But only counting FIDs with a min “not a bot” score 

Can apply same to app usage. Signors. Etc.

i like the idea in principle. how do you come up with and enforce non-gameable criteria?

What does this mean? Like the fees we pay for storages can be used as moxie reward?

Is that possible to transfer % of storage fees into that? 
How should that work? We buy a storage and fees goes to protocol to boost rewards and those rewards get people (when someone likes/comments a cast/frame?)