Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

Stephan pfp
Stephan
@stephancill
lots of people seem to think that paying for storage on farcaster means that they won't see ads or be exploited like in web2 1. this money does not fund farcaster apps 2. while there is no serious competition for client diversity there is no inherent reason why this type of exploitation won't happen on warpcast
24 replies
6 recasts
79 reactions

Jason Goldberg โ“‚๏ธ ๐Ÿ’œ pfp
Jason Goldberg โ“‚๏ธ ๐Ÿ’œ
@betashop.eth
A % of Storage fees could also easily be pumped into moxie to reward quality content, frames developers, app developers โ€” with non gameable criteria
3 replies
1 recast
13 reactions

Stephan pfp
Stephan
@stephancill
i like the idea in principle. how do you come up with and enforce non-gameable criteria?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Jason Goldberg โ“‚๏ธ ๐Ÿ’œ pfp
Jason Goldberg โ“‚๏ธ ๐Ÿ’œ
@betashop.eth
Weโ€™ve got it already with casts and frames Casts earn based on who engages. The scoring system has been proven out for 3 months now. Then frames earn based on unique FIDs using the frames. But only counting FIDs with a min โ€œnot a botโ€ score Can apply same to app usage. Signors. Etc.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Samuel pfp
Samuel
@samuellhuber.eth
If itโ€˜s ecosystem wide how would the moxie criteria and scoring ossify? How would it extend beyond a we all trust airstack to do it (fine today, may not be in the future)
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction