Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ben 🟪
@benersing
I've been thinking a lot lately about how to scale Trust. Tech solutions are great, but often gamed. Identifying people who are trustworthy most of the time, is relatively easy. What's hard is cultivating disincentives to minimize the likelihood of untrustworthy behavior in edge cases. 1/2
4 replies
1 recast
15 reactions
Ben 🟪
@benersing
How one weights the various components of Trust is also variable. A trustworthy person could mean something slightly different to me than to you. Ultimately it's a group that defines it for itself. But with deep social ties disintegrating in the west, how are we then to address the Trust deficit that has emerged? 2/
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Brock The Breadcat🍓
@breadcat
another idea I prototyped called "rock jar" modeled after balancing rocks. let 2 people agree onchain to work. then each can leave a rating 1-5 & it becomes a "rock" in your jar. overtime even if someone burned you it would be a small rock in a stack of large ones if you're good. if they're lame would be all small
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Steen
@usersteen.eth
This is fun 10000 $DEGEN
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
MTH
@mthch
Some sort of a social trust graph. The people who follow you define how much you can be trusted. But not the numbers of followers. but the quality of your followers. Obviously, this raise the question, what are "quality followers?" It's not the number of followers, but the value of your tweets.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
