Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0xdesigner
@0xdesigner
ironically leaving farcon more bearish on farcaster. the protocol wants to compete and win at the client level. clients want to win and avoid being dependent on the protocol. all roads lead to winner take all. what’s the point?
36 replies
3 recasts
93 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Wrote up my thoughts here. Thanks for the nudge. https://warpcast.com/dwr.eth/0x16de8c53
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
0xdesigner
@0xdesigner
say you're able to grow qDAU and successfully empower other clients (hypothetically). another client (a non twitter clone) achieves escape velocity user growth, far exceeding any other on the protocol. why wouldn't they fork farcaster? they could presumably achieve consensus of the new thing with enough scale.
4 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Austin
@austinmccollom
What does the successful client gain by forking the protocol?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Jonny Mack
@nonlinear.eth
emancipation, agency, freedom to become the masters of their own destiny
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Austin
@austinmccollom
Noble aims - but what about on a technical level? I suppose they get the social graph up to that point, but once they fork it, will they get any more of the social graph changes? I suppose they could keep syncing the changes from farcaster into their graph, but not sync their changes back to farcaster.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction