Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

matthewb.eth pfp
matthewb.eth
@matthewb
imo the points meta emerged as a result of a lack of regulatory clarity that made many products/protocols afraid to issue a token offchain points are a total step backwards for both users and protocols
3 replies
0 recast
3 reactions

Anthony Avedissian pfp
Anthony Avedissian
@antavedissian
What about onchain points? Interesting piece arguing why, if done cheaply and at scale, can be very flexible/powerful https://archetype.mirror.xyz/bbLSBkiAQY7gpSTzmvhlXgW93QSMx2goojhXrjOSWVg
3 replies
0 recast
3 reactions

David Furlong pfp
David Furlong
@df
stack.so is gonna be huge, s/o @graeme for how fast their team is shipping
0 reply
1 recast
4 reactions

eric.base.eth 🔵 pfp
eric.base.eth 🔵
@ericbrown.eth
Great article outlining the difference between an onchain point and tokens. I would be curious if you or stack have done any analytics on the cost of issuing points onchain especially at scale?
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

matthewb.eth pfp
matthewb.eth
@matthewb
will take a look, thank you! at first glance my reaction would be, aren’t “onchain points” just tokens?
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction