Ansgar pfp

Ansgar

@ansgar.eth

249 Following
188771 Followers


Ansgar pfp
Ansgar
@ansgar.eth
Agree! It's funny how this is true again now - I had such a hard time deciding which of the two to go into in 2016. Did some AI, but realized I was more passionate about crypto. No regrets! I will say though - I am not sold on the idea that the overlap between the two will be particularly meaningful in the near term.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Ansgar pfp
Ansgar
@ansgar.eth
game 4
1 reply
54 recasts
176 reactions

Ansgar pfp
Ansgar
@ansgar.eth
I'd highly recommend participating in the election prediction markets! They are a very interesting new addition to our sense making toolkit, and the best way to build intuition around them is by having skin in the game.
1 reply
74 recasts
128 reactions

Ansgar pfp
Ansgar
@ansgar.eth
538 quality has pretty clearly cratered after Nate Silver's departure. He had a good in-depth article about it a few months ago: https://www.natesilver.net/p/why-i-dont-buy-538s-new-election
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Ansgar pfp
Ansgar
@ansgar.eth
Many things to legitimately criticize Donald Trump for, but the Harris campaign tweeting out a video of him marveling at the SpaceX rocket booster catch - one of the most impressive feats of engineering in recent history - as if that somehow deserved ridicule is sad. https://x.com/KamalaHQ/status/1848878029193560424
2 replies
37 recasts
110 reactions

Ansgar pfp
Ansgar
@ansgar.eth
Latest Elon video game video accidentally includes the audio recording of a SpaceX starship flight 5 review call (the one where they caught the booster) he was on while playing. Super interesting to get a glimpse of the SpaceX internal operations! https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1849914261482652113
0 reply
43 recasts
100 reactions

Ansgar pfp
Ansgar
@ansgar.eth
Oh I don't (necessarily) believe she will win! Just that as of this very moment, her odds are better than 35% to do so. I similarly had a pretty large Trump position when his odds were at 45% a few weeks ago, because that seemed clearly undervalued. Then I exited that position (at a profit) as the odds swung.
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions

Ansgar pfp
Ansgar
@ansgar.eth
Polymarket Trump odds do seem a bit high. I just bought additional $1000 worth of Kamala shares at 35.4%. Seems +EV. Although of course chances are the market indeed knows better than me.
7 replies
43 recasts
107 reactions

Ansgar pfp
Ansgar
@ansgar.eth
Come watch @shilpa and me battle for the Dominion crown in a bit over an hour!
1 reply
84 recasts
157 reactions

Ansgar pfp
Ansgar
@ansgar.eth
Haha I can’t go down without a fight!
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Ansgar pfp
Ansgar
@ansgar.eth
Gm Starbase! Today is going to be my first ever time watching a rocket launch in-person - looks like I picked a good one! https://x.com/spacex/status/1845424870655398102
1 reply
41 recasts
105 reactions

Ansgar pfp
Ansgar
@ansgar.eth
But it also means our messaging is caught somewhere in between. "Best of both worlds", while I deeply believe is actually true, doesn’t seem to be a clear enough message.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Ansgar pfp
Ansgar
@ansgar.eth
Right, must have been some sort of block. I was just confused when the ping didn't just fail, but returned from a different address. Never seen that before.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Ansgar pfp
Ansgar
@ansgar.eth
I was unfortunately already off the train by the time I read this. Didn't have time to investigate further.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Ansgar pfp
Ansgar
@ansgar.eth
Can someone explain what's happening here? On train WiFi, when pinging 1.1.1.1 I get a normal response, but when pinging 1.0.0.1 (both are Cloudflare DNS servers) I get a response from the train router instead.
3 replies
4 recasts
61 reactions

Ansgar pfp
Ansgar
@ansgar.eth
Context: https://x.com/nathanpmyoung/status/1832694333599785319
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Ansgar pfp
Ansgar
@ansgar.eth
So embracing the market way of fixing this is the antifragile solution.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Ansgar pfp
Ansgar
@ansgar.eth
I don’t want to specifically defend these markets, not sure they are useful. But the general point is, any such inefficiency contains its own reward for fixing it. So if something like this keeps happening, someone will spend the effort to build a model to detect and immediately arb back out such manipulation.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Ansgar pfp
Ansgar
@ansgar.eth
In general my guiding principle in these questions is "don't solve via rule enforcement what can be solved via markets", even if those markets sometimes need some time to mature and become efficient.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Ansgar pfp
Ansgar
@ansgar.eth
Not sure I agree actually! These types of temporary market inefficiencies just provide incentives for actors to come in and bring them back to the true equilibrium. E.g. in my case I bought some more (cheaper) shares once I noticed the drop. Given that my underlying conviction didn't change, that was free money.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction