Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ansgar
@ansgar.eth
There has been quite a bit of backlash against this recent issuance change proposal by @caspar and me (and maybe rightfully so). I tried to clarify our intention in a likely way too long tweet over on X. Hope that adds some context. https://x.com/adietrichs/status/1775554454923747758
5 replies
17 recasts
117 reactions
Samus
@orangesamus.eth
Really enjoyed listening to the podcast you joined with Hasu. I’m curious if you disagree with this framing I posted in a thread below? I’m not sure I understand any counterpoints to this: https://warpcast.com/orangesamus.eth/0x7668549c
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
oliver
@oliverk120.eth
Was your change capping issuance (to reduce incentive to grow eth staked beyond a point) or actually a hard cap on the % that could be staked? I recall listening to your recent podcast but don’t recall your specific position
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Kody • Smoothly
@kodys.eth
I think you and @caspar presented this on the recent UCC podcast perfectly. People come at this with not enough context, and the first reaction for everyone is a hard no (myself included). But, given some time to understand the issue, I believe some change needs to be made. Thanks for getting the conversation started.
1 reply
0 recast
6 reactions
Ladislaus
@ladislaus
Thanks to all of you for the extensive analyses and for raising awareness. First time I recall a proposal being cancelled (for now) for being a proposal. Burden of proof is on Xitter influencers to convince me that their resistance-to-change is not the only counter-argument.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Caster Cat #648 🎩🧾
@ariansh.eth
It's a well thought out and important proposal and discussion to have 1213 $DEGEN
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
