Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/brypto
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
Ah yes, who should bear the cost -- professional investors who after doing diligence, decide to bet on an early-stage venture knowing full well that the majority of investments won't return money? OR unsuspecting retail audiences? Really a tough moral quandary 🙄 https://x.com/Jskybowen/status/1896612643584328067
8 replies
3 recasts
37 reactions
tldr (tim reilly)
@tldr
Crypto: “Onboard retail to tokens.” ETH/Base: “Bring the world onchain.” ^ Simplest way of describing why I love building on Base.
1 reply
1 recast
7 reactions
kevin j
@entropybender
well the second would be crime so not sure if this is ethics lol
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
triumph
@triumph
lmfao at least saying the quiet part out loud i guess
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
YES2Crypto 🎩 🟪🟡
@yes2crypto.eth
The toughest
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
LGHT
@lght.eth
ethics lol
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Shihao
@shihao
in the 2nd case the token is the product that achieved pmf - the market is looking for something to bet on and the token provide that betting venue. The actual "product" in the 2nd case is just an advertisement tool for the token. definitely a lot more morally questionable though.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
alex
@proxystudio.eth
hot take: the majority of traders super active in early-stage, highly-speculative markets know exactly what they are buying/selling. especially any of the ones seeking out "value" and if apps or protocols are creating tokens they can just be really upfront about this stuff cringe to think about retail as exit liq in 2025. retail didn't come buy our tokens, we traded them with one another
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
L3MBDA
@l3mbda
you’re absolutely right
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
