Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
I don’t think we need other general purpose clients right now It’s a hard sell to compete against Warpcast (shoutout @woj.eth and SC for being ballers) It’s like what Dixon said in that podcast - it’s not even the existence of an alt client that gives users leverage, but the ability for one to exist
10 replies
1 recast
46 reactions
Matthew
@matthew
I think we index too much as an ecosystem on the idea that "client" = app that looks very similar to warpcast
5 replies
1 recast
19 reactions
woj ツ
@woj.eth
i somewhat disagree while we may not “need” more clients we def should want it sole ability to create vs existence feels like cope — this is not an easy software that can be shipped in a month from start to finish, so id suggest that we definitely want to have more options to keep the protocol neutral
2 replies
0 recast
7 reactions
links 🏴
@links
Don’t build on FC. Build using FC.
0 reply
1 recast
4 reactions
Satoshi Tomatomoto
@tomato.eth
I'd be a lot more comfortable with Warpcast being the only client if it were open source. Having the entire network depend on a closed source black box doesn't sit right with me.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
max ↑🎩
@baseddesigner.eth
curious to see @kiosk if it’s still happening
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Aleph 🎩 ↑
@aleph
Specialized clients are going to be big. And we will likely have a handful of them winning. That’s the bet of @memecaster.eth
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Eben
@d4rkr4bbit
I'm not convinced this isn't reddit with character limits and on a blockchain...
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
adnum
@adnum
Well warpcast is ceashing allot latelly for me. So I am in the camp of those that would need an alternative. 🙈😂 444 $degen
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
✿Khadija✿🎩🍖Ⓜ️
@khadijaali123
we should focus on improving our existing client rather than creating new ones.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
