androidsixteen pfp
androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
It’s ironic that we’re simultaneously acknowledging the downsides of plastics and promoting GLP-1 meds It’s the hubris of a materially advanced society — we can’t fathom how engineering our materials and our bodies could be bad for us Though the negatives of GLPs will likely be discovered sooner (spoiler alert: muscle loss)
11 replies
7 recasts
70 reactions

christopher pfp
christopher
@christopher
I’m not sure the muscle loss is entirely pro forma GLP but subsequent success of the drug itself. Kinda like how Viagra was originally researched for chest pain and hypertension.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

androidsixteen pfp
androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
https://warpcast.com/androidsixteen.eth/0xd2661de5
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

christopher pfp
christopher
@christopher
Yeah “muscle loss from substantial weight loss” Muscle loss seems fine if all the other major morbid risks are taken off the table, too.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

androidsixteen pfp
androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
But why risk side effects at all if you’re not in dire straits? I’m advocating against using this as a lifestyle drug in situations that do not require pharmacological intervention
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

christopher pfp
christopher
@christopher
It’s not really a substance you can easily use as a lifestyle drug since results aren’t noticeable for weeks at a time. You have to be 30+ BMI to get it prescribed. Most folks rebound with weight gain once they get off of it. Another really important discovery is that GLP/peptide agonists virtually eliminates dependencies with some substances and alcohol. Like almost cures them. We thought they were mental diseases you could only go to therapy or prison to rehabilitate. No longer true. A lot more good outweighing bad.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction