Folks, repeat after me:

𝑻𝒐𝒌𝒆𝒏 𝒈𝒐𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒏𝒂𝒏𝒄𝒆 𝒊𝒔 𝒂𝒏 𝒂𝒏𝒕𝒊-𝒑𝒂𝒕𝒕𝒆𝒓𝒏

Folks, repeat after me:

𝑻𝒐𝒌𝒆𝒏 𝒈𝒐𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒏𝒂𝒏𝒄𝒆 𝒊𝒔 𝒂𝒏 𝒂𝒏𝒕𝒊-𝒑𝒂𝒕𝒕𝒆𝒓𝒏

https://x.com/euler_mab/status/1817645749808889904

Expanding the onchain economy 🌌
idanlevin.xyz

Ideally no governance and immutable contracts 

If governance is needed, both corporate governance and committees have proven safer than pure coin voting

I like Optimism’s hybrid approach, but it feels mostly like theatre right now. Meaning it hasn’t really been stress tested against capture

which other form of governance have you seen that you would pick and is different?

(I love the Optimism which combines coin voting and citizen voting, which ia still a form of coin voting)

crypto dad /cryptodads - Lucky Husband, Blessed Father & Based Dev for CryptoDads 🔨🔵🟡  X -https://x.com/StephenMill3r

@richie summarized it well:

https://warpcast.com/richie/0x09aa3236

/mantej / Cryptography Engineering at Cash App / Adjunct Professor at NYU / cat daddy 🐈 🐈‍⬛

https://warpcast.com/androidsixteen.eth/0xb096186e

building degencast.wtf /degencast . ex-bitmain, binance

Not let people vote with their money?

We can try literally anything else

what's the alternative?
https://docs.farcaster.xyz/learn/contributing/governance

a decade+ of consumer products | decentralized analytics: /intelligent | self exploration: /tanishq

No clue, I don’t know what ENS’ governance system is like

Organizations work better with Hats. Save time, automate onboarding, and make better decisions with programmable onchain roles.

the more I think about protocol security and the more I think about sustainable tokenomics, for some weird reason @hatsprotocol serves both purposes.

let me ask ChatGPT what an anti-pattern is real quick