Content
@
https://opensea.io/collection/dev-21
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
Sometimes I gaslight myself into thinking I’m not using AI correctly because I reject Cursor composer frequently and can’t get the 100x productivity gains I read about online But the reality is: the “build an app in a day” approach leads to a sprawling codebase and taking the time to architect things well is still the way to go
7 replies
3 recasts
53 reactions
alex
@proxystudio.eth
Yeah I don’t think it makes sense if cursor is the only process Should be an entrance, a gateway. Our culture is so obsessed with optimization we’re gonna end up without anything to optimize!
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
MJC
@mjc716
the privilege of being allowed to reject a composer suggestion will be a status symbol in the future
2 replies
0 recast
6 reactions
MM
@listen2mm.eth
https://preview.redd.it/gmefgibsqhb61.jpg?auto=webp&s=85be180f36acb1470b8ea36c2693cbe57627c543 I am reminded of this quote often. Especially wrt architecting software
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
ȷď𝐛𝐛
@jenna
zeno’s codebase
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
artlu 🎩
@artlu
I can only laugh when it goes through 5 or 6 failed attempts, and concludes it's best to remove the entire feature altogether (thus shutting up the compiler and the linter, but not achieving a darn thing)! he just like me fr
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Ako🎩ツ
@ak0o0.eth
AI could ever deliver the same quality, structure, and creativity that a seasoned, battle-hardened programmer brings to the table, I think it’d be kind of terrifying in a way. For someone like me, who’s more of an amateur in this field, it’s probably more useful and practical.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
tldr (tim reilly)
@tldr
Haha cc @maxp.eth
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
