Alex pfp
Alex
@alex-gedevani
Good analogy explaining intents vs transactions
4 replies
1 recast
8 reactions

peng pfp
peng
@peng
source, ser?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Jeeva pfp
Jeeva
@jeevas
Great analogy. Seems to be a general evolution in any kind of collaboration (humans to humans, humans to machines and machines to machines). You naturally get less and less prescriptive on the how and focus simply on the outcome.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

patrion pfp
patrion
@patrion
This is a distinction that never occurred to be before, and helps to explain why gig economy jobs are on the rise. Thanks for sharing. This also helps clarify a nagging question I’ve been having about why these processes are still plagued with issues. If you’ll indulge me in a thread…
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

will pfp
will
@w
glad to see this catching up -- very much what we've been going for with our incentivized actions but this language feels a lot cleaner
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction