Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
antimo 🎩
@antimofm.eth
We complain about bad UX in web3 because we'd like it to improve, but having a tolerance for it is what allows us as users to try new products and founders to push the envelope
2 replies
1 recast
20 reactions
Zeronium
@zeronium
I think Web3 hyper-focuses on UX to its detriment in some ways. UX is important, but the core value proposition being clear is far greater. People will work through poor UX in both Web2 and Web3, if they want to be part of what the product offers.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Zenigame
@zeni.eth
Some people will, of course, but the masses wont. Web3 relies on network effects, so the masses are important.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Zeronium
@zeronium
I’ll posit this: in ‘21 when the market exploded, UX was worse. New users who came in were regular folk, not degens, not Web3 natives - the masses. The reason why it exploded - incredibly clear value prop. UX is important, but clear value is what’ll drive user acquisition.
3 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Father Morwen
@alditrus
Big agree with this take. If you want non-natives using your product, you need good UX, but if you don't have clear value prop, what's the point. FC has been pretty successful at balancing both of these.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Zenigame
@zeni.eth
I'm now a six week-old crypto baby. FC is by far the best intro to the extended web3 ecosystem that I've seen.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Father Morwen
@alditrus
True that. UX goes far beyond just UI, it also extends to the network effects and how the social graph is cultivated. Dan and the team really knocked it out of the ballpark in this regard.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
