This is a good decision. Preferenxe falsification is a big problem in society and we need to see people's honest views. It would be really cool if Farcaster follows it, by implementing ZK likes. Can probably borrow technology from zupoll.

This is a good decision. Preferenxe falsification is a big problem in society and we need to see people's honest views. It would be really cool if Farcaster follows it, by implementing ZK likes. Can probably borrow technology from zupoll.

https://x.com/wanghaofei/status/1793096366132195529

we need to remove the number of followers we have too

app.intersend.io | sequence. pimlico. poap. polygon. consensys. paxful. flipside crypto. dash. bridgewater. darpa. secdef. navy. dia | linktr.ee/alexanderchopan

I really wonder how many people would continue using a social network (or protocol) where that wasn’t visible, or, at the very least, deprioritized from a UX standpoint. Not convinced incentives are aligned.

Clarity-technologies.com COO and co-founder, Internet Explorer, VIP 🧭 Co-host of /music 🎵 

xSonos xOura

bradbarrish.me

agree w u. would need calibrating. 

but tinder doesn’t do it. 

kidding 😂

They kind of do it: if you have a gold or platinum account you can see who likes you, though it does cap out the number at 9,999

BDFL of Quilibrium, Eng @ Farcaster, ex-Coinbase, always opinionated, never hydrated

/quilibrium

ya but someone can’t decide if they wanna date you unless they can see how many and who else did 😂

please god let me never go fishing like that or whatever that topless dude is doing.